IATA Standard Ground Handling, STANDARD GROUND HANDLING AGREEMENT, IATA Standard Ground Handling Agreement, Standard, Standard Ground Handling Agreement, Standard, Possibility of amending Article 8, IATA, Ground Handling, STANDARD GROUND HANDLING, STANDARD GROUND HANDLING Agreements, The Standard Ground Handling Agreement SGHA, Ground Operations Safety Manual In practice, however, it is difficult to: imagine it, unless an airline has sufficient resources ( Like what. B ground support personnel and equipment) ready to play the role of a incumbent operator. The activities of most airlines are thin and are increasingly thin. The training rules in the new clause 5.6 define as a minimum awareness of the rules and regulations applicable to the material handler and refer to the IATA materials in clause 5.3. IATA International Air Transport A. The Ground Operations Safety Manual. The Ag Airside GOSM defines the GA groundhandling standards for SPS. SGHA 2018 does not fully address data protection, although the definition of tickets has been extended to eTickets. The original clause 5.10 of the SGHA 2013, which stated that “when providing the services, the parties agree to comply with all applicable data protection laws”, has been deleted. The insolvency of carriers can also have a wider impact.
For example, the UK CAA suspended Monarch Airlines` AOC when it went bankrupt in October 2017 and forced it to cease operations with immediate effect. They no longer needed groundhandling services. The new clause 3.3 of the SGHA 2018 prohibits self-handling if an airline has already outsourced it as part of the SGHA. In Europe, for example, the 1996 EU Groundhandling Directive (96/67/EC) opened up the groundhandling market to competition and maintained the carrier`s general freedom to clear customs at an airport itself. The 38th edition of IATA`s Airport Handling Manual (AHM) is now live. The EMO contains the latest iteration of the SGHA, which reflects developments in both aviation and the broader sense, and is the result of consultation and input from airlines, terminals and other industry stakeholders. Many of these changes are purely editorial and modify SGHA 2013. However, some changes are significant and focus on operational practices, improved standards, training, bankruptcies, claims and compliance in general. We briefly reviewed the main changes to the Main Agreement and Appendix B and looked at what they might mean for users. Data protection has been included in the compliance checklist in point 1.1 of the SGHA 2018.
This amendment is likely to have the effect of raising data protection to the level of prohibitions against corruption, opponents of competition and child labour. In addition, it is also useful not to overload the SGHA with legal sections on data protection. In 2013, IATA`s Ground Handling Council authorized the use of yellow pages to publish texts amending Annex B in the years between new versions of the SGHA. Annex B of the SGHA 2018 added the yellow pages to paragraph 8. In the future, this will provide some flexibility in the baseline model. In the 2013 SGHA, there was some confusion as to the time limit that applies to a carrier`s right to compensation. The confusion was caused by the sentence: “Any claim must be filed within the time limits set out in Article 31.2 of the 1999 Montreal Convention”. . . .